Following up on this thread, I've collected a few source materials for "linear" + "programming":
- Marshall K. Wood and George B. Dantzig, Programming of Interdependent Activities I: General Discussion, Econometrica 17:3/4 (1949) 193-199.
The use of "programming" in the sense of planning goes back at least this far: "Programming, or program planning, may be defined as the construction of a schedule of actions by means of which an economy, organization, or other complex of activities, may move from one defined state to another or from a defined state toward some specifically defined objective."
- George B. Dantzig, Programming of Interdependent Activities II: Mathematical Model, ibid. 200-211.
The terms "linear program" and "linear programming" are used, with their familiar meanings, in this second part of the paper.
- Philip M. Morse, Trends in Operations Research, Journal of the Operations Research Society of America 1:4 (1953) 159-165.
This is the source for Laura Albert's quotation that started the conversation: "Incidentally, it seems to me that the term 'linear programming' is a most unfortunate phrase for this promising technique, particularly since many possible extensions appear to be in nonlinear directions. A more general yet more descriptive term, such as 'bounded optimization,' might have been a happier choice." It seems that Morse is most concerned with "linear" being too restrictive; but as computers had already appeared by 1953, perhaps he also foresees that "programming" would come to have a different meaning. (The largest professional society in the field was formed as the Mathematical Programming Society in 1973, but changed its name to the Mathematical Optimization Society in 2010.)
- George B. Dantzig, Linear Programming. Operations Research 50:1 (2002) 42-47.
Writing much later, George Dantzig credits Tjalling Koopmans for suggesting "linear programming" during a 1948 visit to the Rand Corporation -- inspiring Dantzig to use that as the title of a talk he gave later the same day.
------------------------------
Bob Fourer
AMPL Optimization Inc. / Northwestern University
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 07-11-2026 11:13
From: Paul Rubin
Subject: "L๐ข๐ง๐๐๐ซ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ " ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ ๐ฉ๐ก๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐: do you agree?
Not that long ago I would have gone with "vertex hopping" or maybe "edge sliding", but interior point methods spoiled that. Is "polytope wanderlust" too geeky?
------------------------------
Paul Rubin
Professor Emeritus
Michigan State University
East Lansing MI
------------------------------